Peer Reviewing Process
- Purpose of Peer Review
Peer review ensures that published research is reliable, credible, and of high academic quality. It provides authors with constructive feedback and helps editors make fair decisions.
- Type of Peer Review
- Double-blind review: Neither authors nor reviewers know each other’s identity.
- Process Steps
- Manuscript Submission
- Authors submit manuscripts via the journal’s online system.
- Initial Editorial Assessment
- The Editor-in-Chief or handling editor checks scope, quality, and ethics compliance.
- Desk rejection occurs if it is unsuitable.
- Reviewer Selection
- Qualified experts in the field are invited to review.
- Typically, 2–3 independent reviewers are assigned.
- Review Process
- Reviewers assess originality, methodology, ethical standards, clarity, and contribution to the field.
- Reviewers provide written feedback and a recommendation (Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject).
- Editorial Decision
- The handling editor evaluates reviewers’ comments.
- The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief or delegated editor.
- Revision & Resubmission
- Authors respond to reviewers’ comments and resubmit.
- Revised manuscripts may undergo re-review.
- Final Decision & Acceptance
- Once reviewers and editors are satisfied, the manuscript is accepted and sent to production.
- Responsibilities of Reviewers
- Provide objective, constructive, and timely feedback.
- Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript.
- Declare conflicts of interest and decline review if biased.
- Avoid misuse of information or ideas from the manuscript.
- Responsibilities of Editors
- Ensure fair and unbiased review.
- Select reviewers based on expertise, not personal preference.
- Maintain confidentiality of submissions.
- Handle disputes or ethical concerns according to COPE guidelines.
